Skip to content

Unraveling Indifferentism: Bertrand Conway’s Defense of Religious Truth

In an era where the blending of cultural and spiritual landscapes often leads to a homogenized view of religious beliefs, the concept of indifferentism — the notion that all religions are equal in value and truth — has gained traction. However, this perspective, while promoting tolerance and coexistence, raises profound theological and philosophical questions. Reverend Bertrand L. Conway, a prominent figure in Catholic apologetics, offers a compelling counterpoint to indifferentism in his critical examination, “Indifferentism, the Heresy that All Religions are Equal: A Consequence of Martin Luther’s Heresy of Faith Alone.”

Conway’s work is a deep dive into the theological implications of indifferentism and traces its roots to the seismic shifts brought about by the Protestant Reformation, particularly through Martin Luther’s doctrine of sola fide, or justification by faith alone. Conway argues that this foundational tenet of Protestantism inadvertently laid the groundwork for a relativistic approach to religious truth, which could lead to the conclusion that the specific tenets of one’s faith are secondary to a generalized faith in the divine.

The Core of Conway’s Argument

At the heart of Conway’s critique is the defense of the Catholic doctrine as the singular path to spiritual truth, a stance that inherently challenges the premise of indifferentism. Conway posits that indifferentism dilutes the essence of religious conviction and the imperative of adhering to doctrinal truths. He contends that such a viewpoint not only undermines the Catholic faith but also diminishes the integrity of all religious traditions by suggesting that the distinct doctrines, rituals, and teachings of each faith are interchangeable and ultimately inconsequential.

The Consequence of Luther’s Legacy

Conway meticulously connects the dots between Luther’s emphasis on faith alone and the rise of indifferentism. He suggests that by reducing the complex relationship between the believer and the divine to a matter of individual faith, devoid of the necessity for institutional or doctrinal alignment, Luther inadvertently opened the door to a form of spiritual relativism. In Conway’s view, this shift has profound implications, leading to a landscape where religious identity and adherence to specific teachings become secondary to a vague sense of spiritual affinity.

Defending Doctrine and Denouncing Relativism

Conway’s defense of Catholicism is not merely a denunciation of Protestantism or other religious beliefs but a broader critique of the relativistic tendencies of modernity. He champions the necessity of doctrinal fidelity, arguing that the truths of the Catholic faith are not just a matter of subjective preference but are grounded in divine revelation and ecclesiastical authority. This stance challenges the indifferentist perspective by asserting that truth in matters of faith is not only knowable but essential for salvation.

The Call for Discernment

In his exploration of indifferentism, Conway is not dismissing the value of interfaith dialogue or the importance of respecting diverse religious beliefs. Instead, he is calling for discernment — a thoughtful evaluation of religious truths that transcends mere tolerance to engage with the profound questions of faith, salvation, and divine revelation. His work serves as a reminder of the depth and seriousness with which religious beliefs have been historically approached and the dangers of reducing them to a lowest common denominator of generic spirituality.

Conclusion

Bertrand L. Conway’s critique of indifferentism is a robust defense of the Catholic faith and a cautionary tale about the implications of religious relativism. His work challenges the contemporary inclination to blur the lines between distinct religious traditions in the name of inclusivity and tolerance. By tracing the roots of indifferentism back to the Reformation, Conway invites readers to reflect on the importance of doctrinal integrity and the enduring quest for spiritual truth in a pluralistic world. In doing so, he provides a valuable perspective on the ongoing dialogue between faith traditions and the search for common ground in an increasingly interconnected global religious landscape.

Share the Post:

Related Posts